amber
E471
Industrial fatty-acid emulsifier shown to disrupt gut mucus barrier and microbiome in mouse models. Ubiquitous in baked goods and chocolate.
Low Tox Gear · Scanner
Darkmilk dessert
Is Cadbury Darkmilk dessert low tox? Our scanner flagged 1 ingredient (1 in the caution tier) on its published label, screened against our 237 source-cited chemical rules.
1 caution
1 ingredient flagged
What we flagged
Full ingredients (from label)
Water_cream_concentrated skimmed _milk_sugarchocolate chip cookie 10% (_wheat_ flour (with added calcium, iron, niacin, thiamin), sugar, vegetable margarine (vegetable oils (palm, rapeseed), water, salt, emulsifier (E475), colours (curcumin, annatto)), rice flour, water, dried glucose syrup, treacle, chocolate chips (sugar, cocoa mass, cocoa butter, emulsifier (_soya_ lecithin), flavouring, cocoa powder), high cocoa milk chocolate 3% (sugar, cocoa mass, skimmed _milk_ powder, cocoa butter, _milk_ fat, emulsifier (_soya_ lecithin), natural vanilla flavouring), fat reduced cocoa powder, palm oil, modified maize starch, dextrose, pork gelatine, dried whey (from _milk_), emulsifiers (E471, E472b), dried _buttermilk_, maltodextrin, stabilisers (E401, E410, E412, E415, E450, pectin), dried glucose syrup, salt, acidity regulators (sodium citrates).
How this analysis is generated
Each ingredient on this product's published label is matched against our 237 source-cited chemical rules, each documenting a concern from peer-reviewed research and regulatory sources. Severity tiers:
- Avoid (red) — banned or restricted in the EU, UK or Canada but still legal in the US, IARC-listed, or strong contact-allergen evidence.
- Caution (amber) — regulatory caution, contamination risk, or condition-specific irritant.
- Mild (green) — low concern but commonly avoided in low-tox formulations.
Each flag links to its primary chemical-level source, and each condition pill links to a PubMed-indexed paper that discusses the chemical class in the context of that condition. Every citation is a real peer-reviewed paper — we don't link to Wikipedia or PubMed search pages. Some pairs use a topically-broad paper (e.g. a fragrance-allergen patch-test review) rather than a single-pair study where the literature is thin. The full evidence chain (chemical → mechanism → condition → paper) is one click away.
This is automated analysis of a published label, not medical advice — always verify the label yourself before changing products. Methodology and source list at scan.lowtoxgear.com.