Low Tox Gear · Scanner

Thanks To Nature Shaving Cream Tube 250mL

9342746005385 · thanks to nature

Is Thanks To Nature Shaving Cream Tube 250mL low tox? Our scanner flagged 6 ingredients (6 in the caution tier) on its published label, screened against our 237 source-cited chemical rules.

6 caution 6 ingredients flagged

What we flagged

amber

Cocamidopropyl Betaine

Ostensibly 'gentle' but ACDS Allergen of the Year 2004. Contains DMAPA/amidoamine impurities.

Read source

amber

Phenoxyethanol

Preservative — generally well-tolerated but documented as MCAS and contact-dermatitis trigger in sensitive individuals.

Read source

amber

Acrylates Copolymer

Synthetic polymer film-former. Microplastic concern (rinse-off products), low-grade monomer-residue concern.

OECD ENV/JM/MONO(2009)40 polymer assessment

amber

PEG-250 Distearate

Manufacturing process can leave 1,4-dioxane (probable carcinogen) and ethylene oxide as contaminants. Look for 'vacuum-stripped' products.

Read source

amber

Disodium EDTA

Chelating agent — generally tolerated but documented MCAS trigger in case reports.

Read source

amber

CI 19140

Same dye as food Yellow 5; warnings required in EU food but not cosmetic.

Read source

Full ingredients (from label)

Water (Aqua)Palmitic AcidGlycerineStearic AcidMyristic AcidPotassium HydroxideGlycol DistearateBehenyl BehenateCocamidopropyl BetaineCocamide Methyl MEAGlyceryl MyristatePhenoxyethanolPrunus Amygdalus Dulcis (Sweet Almond) OilAcrylates CopolymerPEG-250 DistearateFragranceCastoryl MaleateLauric AcidSodium ChlorideArachidic AcidDisodium EDTACI 19140CI 15985.
How this analysis is generated

Each ingredient on this product's published label is matched against our 237 source-cited chemical rules, each documenting a concern from peer-reviewed research and regulatory sources. Severity tiers:

Each flag links to its primary chemical-level source, and each condition pill links to a PubMed-indexed paper that discusses the chemical class in the context of that condition. Every citation is a real peer-reviewed paper — we don't link to Wikipedia or PubMed search pages. Some pairs use a topically-broad paper (e.g. a fragrance-allergen patch-test review) rather than a single-pair study where the literature is thin. The full evidence chain (chemical → mechanism → condition → paper) is one click away.

This is automated analysis of a published label, not medical advice — always verify the label yourself before changing products. Methodology and source list at scan.lowtoxgear.com.

More Personal Care to scan

See the cleanest Personal Care in our catalogue → Scan your own products →
Share this result WhatsApp