amber
Contains Preservative E223
Documented MCAS, asthma and migraine trigger in sensitive individuals.
Low Tox Gear · Scanner
Favourites
Is Cadbury Favourites low tox? Our scanner flagged 4 ingredients (4 in the caution tier) on its published label, screened against our 237 source-cited chemical rules.
4 caution
4 ingredients flagged
What we flagged
amber
E476
Castor-oil-derived emulsifier ubiquitous in compound chocolate. Same gut-barrier concerns as the other Chassaing-class emulsifiers.
amber
E471
Industrial fatty-acid emulsifier shown to disrupt gut mucus barrier and microbiome in mouse models. Ubiquitous in baked goods and chocolate.
amber
E120
Insect-derived red colour. Documented IgE allergen with anaphylaxis case reports.
DiCello et al. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1999 (carmine anaphylaxis)
Full ingredients (from label)
sugarmilk solidscocoa buttercocoa massglucose syrupvegetable fatcoconut (contains preservative 223)peanut piecesglace cherries (cherries, glucose fructose syrup, colour (163), food acid (330))cocoa powderinvert sugarwheat flourbiscuit pieces (contain wheat)emulsifiers (soy lecithin, 476, 471)barley malt extractgelling agents (1401, 440)golden syruphumectant (422)rice crispsraising agent (500)salthydrolysed milk proteinmaltodextringelatineacidity regulators (331, 575)starch (corn, tapioca)flavourscolours (150c, 163, 120, 160c)vegetable oilenzymes (contain wheat)processing aid (sulphites
How this analysis is generated
Each ingredient on this product's published label is matched against our 237 source-cited chemical rules, each documenting a concern from peer-reviewed research and regulatory sources. Severity tiers:
- Avoid (red) — banned or restricted in the EU, UK or Canada but still legal in the US, IARC-listed, or strong contact-allergen evidence.
- Caution (amber) — regulatory caution, contamination risk, or condition-specific irritant.
- Mild (green) — low concern but commonly avoided in low-tox formulations.
Each flag links to its primary chemical-level source, and each condition pill links to a PubMed-indexed paper that discusses the chemical class in the context of that condition. Every citation is a real peer-reviewed paper — we don't link to Wikipedia or PubMed search pages. Some pairs use a topically-broad paper (e.g. a fragrance-allergen patch-test review) rather than a single-pair study where the literature is thin. The full evidence chain (chemical → mechanism → condition → paper) is one click away.
This is automated analysis of a published label, not medical advice — always verify the label yourself before changing products. Methodology and source list at scan.lowtoxgear.com.